It's not an insult. All it is, is another poor attempt to derail the thread because you or the other mods can't win the argument. You don't want to admit that you are wrong, I get that. No offence caused at all. Not sure why you group mods together. They all have independent thoughts and opinions. ...

So it was repurposed to deliberately cause an insult then, just goes to show your understanding of the problem and how it effects other users. I don't see how it's seen as an insult. I think there is just some misunderstandings here about this and that. All we lose is the 4+4 macros from the mixer ...

You could already do that with the combinator on the Mix Channel all you needed to do was drag the combinator into the Mix Channel, all devices uncombine. Exactly my point. Now they aren't broken. All that programming remains. We have MANY more macros to control and automate. I do realize we lost t...

Going to the trouble of photoshopping a combinator hoping or thinking it will be funny and somehow cause an insult is hardly bullying. Massive waste of time, yes. No I actually made it in the past to help explain to others. Maybe someone else can help explain it better. So it was repurposed to deli...

gullum wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2021

joeyluck wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2021

I made this combi backdrop if anybody wants to put it in the insert


Classic Insert Combi.png

so now we turn to bullying ?

Going to the trouble of photoshopping a combinator hoping or thinking it will be funny and somehow cause an insult is hardly bullying. Massive waste of time, yes.

I put all of my effects that aren't sends into the inserts. This is great for me to keep things organized and be able to find and navigate things faster. So being able to hide them all out of the way and bypass all, without breaking combis is a huge plus IMO. You could already do that with the comb...

... I must miss something obvious here...What did you do, what you cannot do in R12? :? :question: The glaringly obvious thing you're missing is what has been discussed for the last few pages. There is no longer a Combinator on The Mix Channel. Placing the Combinator inside the Mix Channel makes no...

A border out past the wood would have been awful, vents at the sides don't really fix the increase width as they would still be dark enough to draw your eye. Plates at the sides probably wouldn't look any better. What really should have been a consideration was increasing the default zoom of the ra...

The rack is wider. You don't lose device width but what you end up with is an untidy mess. This is another example of things not being thought out properly. Granted when you placed devices inside of a mix channel the border of the insert would cover the sides of the device but it was a long time li...

No matter how I try, I can't seem to get used to the racks new interface if you will...maybe I need more time. Why are there no gaps in the rack on mix and audio channels and gaps on everything else? R11 never looked like that, everything was nice and clean looking, everything was the same size. Is...

no it does not give more controls because it is not the mixer but a combinator therefor you need to change the lock device to the combinator and lose control over the mixer. People that are not using controllers and only using the mouse might have more controls but us that have invested money on co...

Reason 11 V11MixChannel.png Reason 12 V12MixChannel.png empty there looks to be a big difference, but when in use the new version is actually better. you can do this, which give much more controls mixchannelsetR12a.gif The only thing I would change is the combine feature as you loose the controls a...

What has changed? If you have multiple devices in an insert you now need to combine first before you can save. So one extra click is added to the process. BUT, now you CAN put multiple Combinators in the insert. What has not changed: You still cannot save inserts that use multiple Combinators (but ...

What part of anything I said mentioned putting devices in a mix channel was not putting it in combinator. What part said it wasn't a combinator patch. What part mentioned extra work involved? What part claims that it is a convoluted way to do things? None of what I said mentions any of these things...

Lets go back a bit. Lets say you have insert effects inside a Mix Channel. Now lets say you don't put these into a combinator. How exactly are you to save these? That's right you can't you have to put them inside a combinator inside a Mix Channel. So no you are not correct at all we did lose, in a ...

Put it this way in gaining the features of the new combinator we've lost the ability to have multiple fx patches saved as a combi patch when you can't nest the combinator's (being the Mix Channel and the updated Combinator), you can't save what is inside the Mix Channel so you can't load it in anot...

There's an or between those options. Your okay compromise is the lose of ability to save effects chains?? :thumbup: Thanks for pointing that out, there shouldn't have been any compromise. Removal of functionality is what is confusing here. Maybe they should just remove the EQ and Dynamics sections ...

Your okay compromise is the lose of ability to save effects chains?? :thumbup: Thanks for pointing that out, there shouldn't have been any compromise. We don't lose anything in that regard. Whatever fx chains that existed before, that were saved in an insert, were combinator patches. Combinators no...

What was the thought process to getting rid of the built in combinator in a mix channel? Was it lack of ability to place a combinator inside a mix channel to begin with. Was it that the built in combinator on a mix channel just wasn't used by the majority of users who happen to have analytics still...

The more I use Mimic the more frustrating it becomes to use, each of the 8 slots/channels doesn't have individual gate and cv inputs so it won't work well with propulsion, it's not as if there wasn't room to add the proper gate and cv inputs per channel - less cv is something that has become a patte...

Atrocious! This is a release?? Full of bugs. Not optimised, slow and clunky. Feels like this is still a beta. Zoom is especially bad. Zooming in should not resize the whole window. Why it resizes the browser window is another mystery. A lot of devices just look horrible when zoomed in. This is by fa...

scratchnsnifff wrote: ↑

18 Mar 2019

Well that seems like a straight enough answer, in all honesty. And as much as it might hurt financially. The update to 10 is absolutely worth the money. And if I remember correctly, it might still be on sale?

Yes until March 31st!

That’s rough man, as far as I remember I THINK that they said they would give the performance boost to 9.5 users. But I’m not an employee, and idk if that was ever subject to change. I’m hoping for the 9.5 users that this performance patch gets thrown your way. Mainly because there was definitely s...

guitfnky wrote: ↑

15 Mar 2019

AttenuationHz wrote: ↑

15 Mar 2019

Did I win nothing?

yes.

AttenuationHz wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2019

12th or 19th March

Did I win nothing?