:idea: So, i imagine ONE knob (maybe called BOOST)... :idea: Or SQUASH? I like the idea of being able to squash the signal by boosting the quiet parts of the sample, like an extreme one-knob version of Selig Leveler! It turns the sample source into more of a "texture" to work with, basically ignori...

Would an effective compressor / limiter be welcome in the FX section for this Proton ? I want a compressor with makeup gain between the sample and the emitter Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk A breakout on the back could be very interesting. Between what and what? Between the raw sample and the e...

Maybe they've realised that everybody only buys anything during sales, so they want to have a stronger position to go to sale prices from, inspired by the vast number of sales of One I suspect they made when it was 19. I find it truly insulting when companies try to play headgames with their pricin...

Would an effective compressor / limiter be welcome in the FX section for this Proton ? I want a compressor with makeup gain between the sample and the emitter Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk A breakout on the back could be very interesting. Between what and what? Between the raw sample and the e...

geronimo wrote:Would an effective compressor / limiter be welcome in the FX section for this Proton ?

I want a compressor with makeup gain between the sample and the emitter

Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk

Hi, Wait a minute. Proton does not actually store the sample? No, Rack Extension patch files refer to samples. I believe all devices in Reason that use samples do the same thing. Best regards, Gustav Well that sucks. I completely understand the idea of saving a large patches with many samples in a ...

Hi, Hey, a question: When I load a sample into Proton, is there a 100% settings, so the played sample sounds exactly like a raw sample in a browser? No, the entire point of Proton is to mangle your samples. :puf_bigsmile: Best regards, Gustav I really like what Proton does, but IMHO there should be...

Sometimes users start off on 1 platforms such as Cubase and then they switch to another platform, and then there's growing pains because the terminology has changed. And they can't find the term audio warp in the reason manual. Instead of understanding these effects and features by their trademark n...

Did somebody seriously suggest that they want an effect that allows them to maintain the same time and Pitch? So in other words no change to the audio? I have an idea don't use reason and the pitch in the time won't change. It's called the no affect. If you don't use any effect it will maintain the ...

I am currently using a Venice F32 mixer to get everything into reason. Everything works perfectly. What i would like to do is send everything back out of reason, through the board, to use the board for mixing, EQ, etc.. while i can easily see where to assign which of the board's channels attaches t...

if you ask me, Selig here is trying to show you another way of mixing wich, in the end , will give you equally/better results.... you then reply by saying you'll just keep doin' it the way you did.... explain me why you come seek help here then? i believe that i, if i was in your place, i'd tear th...

Thanks Selig - I wouldn't never find the problem by my own. The loudness is not right right now - because I had that PRE thing making things different. The reason why I have two limiters is because I can get a bit more loudness that way. After brickwalling I can add few more db to my sound - withou...

Electric-Metal wrote:

sentient.minority wrote:On the back of the Neptune unit you'll find the words Ken Lee, which refer to this:

Who the #*@% is Ken Lee

If you'd been around since version 1.0 or so, and had been hanging out in the forums, it'd make sense

Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk

There is so much more that could be done with granular capabilities. Not only could they make a synthesizer that's granular, they could also allow you to feed external signals into the green cloud buffers and you could use the granular synthesizer is a granular processor too. Sent from my SM-T710 us...

All this energy and effort should just go into telling the propellerheads to just make a real honest to goodness granular synthesizer. I've been begging them for it since Reason version 2.5.

Sent from my SM-T710 using Tapatalk