Search found 852 matches

by Ottostrom
24 Jun 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!
Replies: 232
Views: 36670

Re: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!

rcbuse wrote: post a patch or screenshot?
Image
Even this patch has a pretty fast attack. Im only trying the synth and have not bought it yet.
by Ottostrom
23 Jun 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!
Replies: 232
Views: 36670

Re: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!

What am i doing wrong with the attack?
Even when i put it on max and it says 10.3 s the sound still starts to play super fast (sounds more lika 0.5 sec attack) :(
I want reallt slow attack but i cant seem to figure out how to get it.
by Ottostrom
08 Jun 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!
Replies: 232
Views: 36670

Re: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!

Vyckeil wrote: Sample latency. Does Nostromo require the VMG-01 to sync with other devices? Would it benefit from PDC?
No offence, but i don't really think you know what you are talking about. And that kind of bothers me since you claim it's a "huge deal" for you...
by Ottostrom
07 Jun 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!
Replies: 232
Views: 36670

Re: Nostromo Synth is in the shop!

BTW> the randomize button is nuts! It comes up with a randomized slot layout from the 2000+ different spectra. There is a randomize button for the spectrum tables!?! :mrgreen: This just made me fall in love with it even more. I've always struggled with pads since I never get them to sound like a li...
by Ottostrom
02 Jun 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Razor tool suddenly not available
Replies: 3
Views: 784

Re: Razor tool suddenly not available

I had this problem a couple of days ago. Its probably in "single take mode" so you need to unclick the little speaker button next to the take that it has chosen for single take.
by Ottostrom
26 May 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: StringWERK new RE
Replies: 196
Views: 35438

Re: StringWERK new RE

Really wish there was a way to solo the instruments so you could play just the cellos or just the violins. A full string ensemble is a bit much sometimes. But it sound fantastic! You could always send in the suggestion. I guess it depends on how the strings sections were recorded... Yeah i guess. B...
by Ottostrom
26 May 2016
Forum: Rack Extensions
Topic: StringWERK new RE
Replies: 196
Views: 35438

Re: StringWERK new RE

Really wish there was a way to solo the instruments so you could play just the cellos or just the violins. A full string ensemble is a bit much sometimes.
But it sounds fantastic!
by Ottostrom
24 May 2016
Forum: Reason Feature Requests
Topic: REASON 10 FEATURE REQUESTS
Replies: 213
Views: 36317

Re: REASON 9.5/10 FEATURE REQUESTS

To make audio recording a little easier when you are alone I would like to ba able to set up a point in the track where the recording mode should kick in. So if I only need to rerecord a certain part of a guitar track i could play along with the existing part to make sure the playing is the same an...
by Ottostrom
24 May 2016
Forum: Reason Feature Requests
Topic: REASON 10 FEATURE REQUESTS
Replies: 213
Views: 36317

Re: REASON 9.5/10 FEATURE REQUESTS

To make audio recording a little easier when you are alone I would like to ba able to set up a point in the track where the recording mode should kick in. So if I only need to rerecord a certain part of a guitar track i could play along with the existing part to make sure the playing is the same and...
by Ottostrom
23 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

selig wrote: The whole concept of a side chain EQ/Filter (which is what I'm assuming you're doing) is to split the INPUT, not the OUTPUT of the compressor, and then EQ/Filter that split signal and send it to the side chain input.
Quick noob question: Where do i find the master input? :mrgreen:
by Ottostrom
23 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

As for your question: others have already answered how, but I'll ask "why"? With Reverb, it is never intended to be heard on it's own. You can never hear reverb on it's own in nature, so who is to even say what it SHOULD sound like on it's own? :) First off: Thank you for all the info about the sid...
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

raccoonboy wrote:Let me know if it works
It did work :thumbs_up:
Too bad i can't quickly switch between different send effects as i would be able to if i used the control room out.
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

Could you possibly use the A/B switch RE? Bit messy but could work and if might be appropriate in some cases if you don't need to test lots of different sends. A = Master Channel (with reverb) B = Copy of Reverb by itself Hook this up just before where the Master Channel usually goes to. I was thin...
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

tibah wrote:You can route the send return to a dedicated mix channel instead of the return section in the mixer.

EDIT: Mkay. This doesn't do what I thought it would.
That was my first thought too, but you can't solo it :cry:
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

Still, it shouldn't be too hard to create another sidechain source elsewhere in the rack to free up the output again. One would think so, but when i use a spider audio splitter to split the master out and connect one of those signals to the sidechain everything starts to sound weird. Almost like it...
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Re: Soloing a send effect

If you switch the wiring on the Master Section and Audio IO units from Master Output to Control Room you can then solo either FX Sends or FX Returns 1-8 using the controls just to the right of the master SSL fader. But im already using the control room output to sidechain the master compressor :| B...
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Soloing a send effect
Replies: 16
Views: 2259

Soloing a send effect

So i recently started using send effects for reverb (which is something i should have done a long time ago) but i was wondering if there's an easy way to only hear what the send effect is doing. On individual tracks i can press the "pre" button and then turn down the fader all the way to only hear t...
by Ottostrom
22 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Reason 9 is ridicubad...
Replies: 404
Views: 53781

Re: Reason 9 is ridicubad...

I told a semi-prominent trance producer that I use reason, and he laughed at me and said it's "a toy". Next time you see that "semi-prominent" producer, link him this: https://youtu.be/8g70M3RTAHQ?t=336 This is Daniel Kandi, releasing on Anjunabeats. Not sure if he upgraded yet, but in 2012 he was ...
by Ottostrom
20 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Parallel audio track with effects
Replies: 5
Views: 949

Re: Parallel audio track with effects

Just use a normal bus send? THIS^^^ Using a send will reduce the hard drive access overhead as well. If you want the same level of control as a parallel channel, then plug the output of the reverb etc. into a Mix Channel instead of using the built in FX returns! :) Sounds like a good way of doing i...
by Ottostrom
20 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Parallel audio track with effects
Replies: 5
Views: 949

Re: Parallel audio track with effects

normen wrote:Just use a normal bus send?
Maybe it is time for me to learn how to use send effects.
Thanks for the answer!
by Ottostrom
20 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Parallel audio track with effects
Replies: 5
Views: 949

Parallel audio track with effects

Is there an easy way to create a parallel audio track that plays the audio with the effects from the original? I usually make a parallel channel for reverb so that i have more control over it, but when it comes to audio tracks (like when i record guitar) i have to copy over all the effects which fee...
by Ottostrom
19 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Reason 9 Officially Announced!
Replies: 402
Views: 52521

Re: Reason 9 Officially Announced!

"They have become the masters of cleverly saying "Hey idiot! Do you have 1 finger??? GREAT! Buy our software and become a ... magnet!" I miss the days when Propellerhead wanted to be taken seriously. Everything they listed here has been in every respectable DAW for years now except these will have t...
by Ottostrom
19 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Reason 9 Officially Announced!
Replies: 402
Views: 52521

Re: Reason 9 Officially Announced!

Remember that some people here will never be satisfied with Reason until it actually becomes another DAW that already exist. Agreed. BUT so far this update looks good. And every criticism of it shouldn't be considered hate. So far I've seen 2 user who are opened with there reason criticism say that...
by Ottostrom
19 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Reason 9 Officially Announced!
Replies: 402
Views: 52521

Re: Reason 9 Officially Announced!

pjeudy wrote:
Ottostrom wrote:I can already feel how much hate this update will get.
I have a feeling that you're feeling we'll be wrong.
Remember that some people here will never be satisfied with Reason until it actually becomes another DAW that already exist.
by Ottostrom
19 May 2016
Forum: Reason General
Topic: Reason 9 Officially Announced!
Replies: 402
Views: 52521

Re: Reason 9 Officially Announced!

I can already feel how much hate this update will get. But i LOVE it!
Was on the fence about buying melodyne a couple of weeks ago but waited. So the pitch editor alone is enough for me to upgrade.