has someony a suggestion how to make proper use of the tap in and outs?
i couldnt find a usable setup until now. which devices i could put there that make sense? apparently the TAP knob has to be set very low otherwise it will destroy your speakers

from a professional view, the design now is much better and more sophisticated. the orange color might be a no-go for some people, me personally i like the colors.

I will report it to Proppelerhead.
I had the problem too and thanks to you, it is now fixed and i get about 15% better performance.

i can confirm, those how have two graphic cards in the macbook pro, it will always use the integrated one in reason, no matter your settings in the system preferences in OSX. Marco Raaphorst alrady provided the solution: http://melodiefabriek.com/blog/audio-glitches-reason-fix/ Get the gfxCardStatus...

if you play for example the midi piano, you do not see the notes light up in the piano roll. that is horrible.
also it lacks the ability to generate chords. not the best sequencer for me. simple yes, but not the best.

haha i bought EVE-AT1 yesterday. today on sale.
murphy's law striked again.

your FX chain for the drums is so amazing. I really learned a lot out of this. i do not have the disperser, but even without it just sound awesome.

The synth looks alright and it sounds alright judging by the demos provided, but with so many synths in my rack already any new synth has to be either better than what's currently available or offer something unique. I think the selling point here is not the uniqueness, but the price. 25 dollars, y...

wow i did not knew anything of this. perfect.

i have the latest and best macbook pro. 2.9GhZ i7. i had to install windows with bootcamp cause of Reasons performance in OSX: On my machine Reason on bootcamp has about 25% more CPU ressources. That is really a shame for the culprit, who i do not know who it is, either the OS, Propellerheads or may...

i do not know how to do it with a RE utility. i myself do such things with the Distributor RE, but you then also need 2 synth devices. the first note hits the first synth and the second note the second. but you can make all sort of variations. for example. on note 1,2,3 play synth 1 and on note 4 sy...

what i really do not understand is, why on OSX Reason needs more CPU than on Windows. Funny thing, on a Macbook Pro the test song stops at 30 seconds, whereas with the same computer with bootcamp i get to 40 seconds. this sucks. btw i got the newest and most upgraded macbook pro you can get and only...

yeah i should contact the Props. I think the combination of the used CPU and used RAM is the culprit. It might be just a not so good setting for Reason. (I do not think that the graphic card is the culprit, the 2.2 has only the Intel Iris Pro and the 2.9 has a Radeon Pro 460 which is by far a better...

yep. the older 2.2 i7 performs better than the new 2.7 or 2.9 Ghz @ the R8 stress test song. Even though they have both 16GM RAM the RAM that comes with the 2.2 is faster. 2.2 has 13.75 nanoseconds latency and 2.9 has 15 nanoseconds latency.

But do not use internet authorization at the same time if you have Reason open on another computer. The Props once blocked my license because i used computer authorization and Internet authorization at the same time for more than 3 times. I had to write customer support and they unlocked it 3 or 4 d...

16GB RAM. I just did a benchmark test with the new and the old. As expected the new one beats the old in every regards. Except the Memory Bandwith is a bit lower and AES encryption. I really hope that either the next OSX update or the next Reason update can fix this. at the moment the best option i ...

today i got the MBP 2016 15" i7 2.9Ghz (Radeon 460). i was and i am and i will still be shocked how bad the performance is. before i had a mid 2014 macbook pro with 2.2Ghz i7 and it performs better than the new one. I AM ANGRY AND SCHOCKED. i tried other audio software like Reaktor 5, and the new ma...

love your sound. i would totally love to have a look at one of your project and maybe try to develop it further, arranging and so on. i have kind of the same issue, i have dozends of unfinished dub techno tracks (less detroit-ish and slower than yours) which all have something like 1:30 to 2:30 minu...

still wins no design award, but good enough i can finally buy it.
RE developer who constantly improve their already existing REs should be rewarded anyway. good job. useful RE.

chenille was indeed a bit confusing and i did not use if often except for some presets, that is why appreciate a design update. good job.

I bought it and got great results out of it. Actually it is my favourite RE I bought this year altough you can achieve same results with existing devices but not that intuitive and fast.

An option for Autechre is missing. It is a whole distinctive genre

Thank you.

A visual redesign is badly needed, but new design is still not a beauty but a step in the right direction.

Good job. Looks amazing. But I think I will pass on this, because I have already so many rack extensions and there is nothing new that would add more benefit to my arsenal. We have envelopes, filters, LFOs, sequencers and even the TableOscillator (ok that one needs so much CPU). I am more the modula...