Another reason for you to hate Waves

Discuss VST stuff here!
User avatar
joeyluck
Moderator
Posts: 11096
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

29 Mar 2023

I dunno. Going subscription only—they knew what the responses would be and what the vibe would be in forums and on social media. And then retracting it within a couple days before seeing how it would work out and if people would adapt?

I will maintain my theory that it was planned or plan B was in a loose back pocket with their hand on it. They weren't committed to the idea.

avasopht
Competition Winner
Posts: 3992
Joined: 16 Jan 2015

29 Mar 2023

Well, it wouldn't be the first time executives ignored all good advice

User avatar
TritoneAddiction
Competition Winner
Posts: 4243
Joined: 29 Aug 2015
Location: Sweden

29 Mar 2023

I saw the backlash in youtube comments. Damn it really was 99% of people absolutely hating Waves move to subscription only. I actually didn't think Waves would change their minds that fast. Glad to see that we as customers actually have some power to change companies business model. Again I don't own any Waves plugins. But I see this as a big win for us perpetuals. :clap: Hopefully this disaster will deter other companies from doing subscription only as well.

User avatar
dvdrtldg
Posts: 2406
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

29 Mar 2023

Gotta say I'm relieved. Waves' business model obviously sucks in a million different ways, but at the end of the day I have a bunch of their plugins that I like very much and rely on heavily

MuttReason
Posts: 342
Joined: 28 Jan 2021

29 Mar 2023

avasopht wrote:
29 Mar 2023
Well, it wouldn't be the first time executives ignored all good advice
Yep, for sure. In fact it would be (roughly, non-scientific estimate) well over the 1,000,000,000th time that corporate senior executives ignored all good advice. IME, anyway… :D

User avatar
Iapetus 9
Posts: 199
Joined: 18 Jan 2015

30 Mar 2023

Their guitar stuff was enough for me to walk away from Waves after a quick test. Perfectly tepid, below average plugins for the money. IMHO, they try to do way too much and end up with average everything, so, Cherry Audio with a longer history.
38L > 51D every time.

User avatar
joeyluck
Moderator
Posts: 11096
Joined: 15 Jan 2015

30 Mar 2023

I'm curious people's take on this...

Let's say you are a company with hundreds of plugins and you are looking for a way to fund the continued maintenance of all of them, in all formats on all the changing platforms.

Would you:

A) Have something like the WUP and/or subscription plan to afford the development?
B) Discontinue older plugins to manage your resources?
C) Make your own plugin format that runs inside your own DAW? (RE for the win!)
D) Something else?

I feel like most plugin devs, even those who make far less plugins than Waves, go with option B. They discontinue and move on, focusing on what they think is selling well or offers superior features.

There's a lot I don't like about Waves—the WaveShells, the endless sales (maybe that ends now to push the value of the plugins and subscription?). And aside from the fact that I stopped using them for now, I can't say I'm upset at any of their strategies. I don't find any of it that ridiculous. They make sense for what they are trying to do I guess.

User avatar
bxbrkrz
Posts: 3873
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

30 Mar 2023

D) No one is mourning wired big phones. Evolution. Survival. Maybe the next thing could be some kind of Web3 plugins, not directly connected to any particular OS, or licenses.
Do we know if Waves is still a strong and profitable company? Maybe they didn't have a choice.
757365206C6F67696320746F207365656B20616E73776572732075736520726561736F6E20746F2066696E6420776973646F6D20676574206F7574206F6620796F757220636F6D666F7274207A6F6E65206F7220796F757220696E737069726174696F6E2077696C6C206372797374616C6C697A6520666F7265766572

EdGrip
Posts: 2349
Joined: 03 Jun 2016

30 Mar 2023

My perception is that Waves don't enjoy the same position within producing and engineering that they once did. My guess is that their plugins tend to be used by people who have used their plugins for a long time, and they're not attracting new users like they did when they were the first plugin company a newcomer would hear of.

But again, I think they're a bad vibes company with various layers of bullshittery, and when you compare them to the pure engineering approach of companies like TDR, Valhalla, or FabFilter, it's hard to imagine giving them money, regardless of if their actual code is great.

EdGrip
Posts: 2349
Joined: 03 Jun 2016

30 Mar 2023

Cherry Audio are on the list, along with Excite Audio and Positive Grid, of plugins with 200MB+ downloads for a plugin. Flat no. No need for it.

User avatar
dvdrtldg
Posts: 2406
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

30 Mar 2023

joeyluck wrote:
30 Mar 2023
There's a lot I don't like about Waves—the WaveShells, the endless sales (maybe that ends now to push the value of the plugins and subscription?). And aside from the fact that I stopped using them for now, I can't say I'm upset at any of their strategies. I don't find any of it that ridiculous. They make sense for what they are trying to do I guess.
Agree in principle, and I get that developers need profits to survive. I have no problem with Waves instituting a subscription service. It's more the way they rolled it out - no warning, no option for existing licence holders to keep using the WUP that they signed up for under the explicit contractual agreement that it wouldn't be taken away from them

Anyway, all fine now

User avatar
Loque
Moderator
Posts: 11239
Joined: 28 Dec 2015

30 Mar 2023

Looks like they made a step back and want to sell their crap like before too.

But I guess the damage is done and the trust is gone.
Reason12, Win10

User avatar
QVprod
Moderator
Posts: 3505
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Contact:

30 Mar 2023

The problem comes down to what you’re paying for. Most of Waves’ updates aren’t really updates. Which is why a lot of people didn’t pay for WUP regularly. I upgraded to the new OS and my “old version “ still works perfectly fine then I’m not inclined to pay for a “compatibility update” where all they did was change the version number.

But if maintenance of the entire plug-in library is the problem, then I’d agree downsizing the old stuff is the answer. Definitely not a forced subscription to 220 plugins of which I might use just 5.

MuttReason
Posts: 342
Joined: 28 Jan 2021

31 Mar 2023

I think Waves have missed their moment and are struggling to find a way to maintain profitability in the future. They’ve been eaten away from multiple directions, from UAD and FabFilter etc that are now pretty commonplace in pro setups through to a bazillion alternatives to Waves at the cheaper/free end of the spectrum. I used to own around a dozen Waves plugins but over time I stopped using all but a couple of them because better alternatives came along. When I saw that first subscription-only email my response was “well goodbye Waves” and that’s where I now remain. I no longer really rely on anything they make and I’m researching alternatives to the couple of plugins I do use because their update policy was pretty garbage even before this recent nonsense.

User avatar
Last Alternative
Posts: 1344
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Location: the lost desert

31 Mar 2023

They got me for about 20 plugins with the recent sales. I thought I was getting a steal! Until I realized they always have sales. I absolutely love their plugins but you gotta wonder if they’re really worth $100-$300 if they’re always on sale for $25?
Not to mention they really lost my trust after this move. I’m glad they retracted but it makes you wonder about the future. Even car companies are doing subscriptions. Multiple plugin companies, Netflix, Spotify, Youtube, Windows 365, mobile car start, etc. We can’t afford for EVERYTHING to be subscriptions! It’s like the whole world is slowly tryna phase out buying something once and owning it. Let’s hope it doesn’t eventually become mandatory for everything. Damn. But I also feel like that won’t happen because again.. no one would afford all that.
https://lastalternative.bandcamp.com
:reason: 12.7.4 | MacBook Pro (16”, 2021), OS Sonoma, M1 Max, 4TB SSD, 64GB RAM | quality instruments & gear

User avatar
dvdrtldg
Posts: 2406
Joined: 17 Jan 2015

31 Mar 2023

Last Alternative wrote:
31 Mar 2023
They got me for about 20 plugins with the recent sales. I thought I was getting a steal! Until I realized they always have sales. I absolutely love their plugins but you gotta wonder if they’re really worth $100-$300 if they’re always on sale for $25?
The non-sale price kicks in if you try to sell the plugin

Waves charge a fee when you transfer your license to someone else, from memory I think it's 15%. But that 15% is calculated at the "full price", not the sale price

So if you got your plugin for $25 reduced from $200, congratulations you got a sweet deal! But selling it will cost you... $30

EdGrip
Posts: 2349
Joined: 03 Jun 2016

31 Mar 2023

Imagine selling a plugin, though

User avatar
Last Alternative
Posts: 1344
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Location: the lost desert

31 Mar 2023

LOL there’s always a catch..
https://lastalternative.bandcamp.com
:reason: 12.7.4 | MacBook Pro (16”, 2021), OS Sonoma, M1 Max, 4TB SSD, 64GB RAM | quality instruments & gear

User avatar
moalla
Posts: 545
Joined: 20 Oct 2017
Location: DDR WEST

01 Apr 2023

Compared now DBX160 with Denderspikes SN01G VCA compressor and the free plugin sounds much much better, more analog vs. a lot of artifacts with the waves one, so now I reallize why waves give so much of their more poor sounding plugins ass freebies the last months, nothing a dicussion would be worth it to have.
https://soundcloud.com/user-594407128
Reason12.5, Yamaha EG112, Ibanez PF10, RhythmWolf, Miniak, Ipad+SparkLE
SE2200t :arrow: VAS micpre MOTO:better repair-mod well made stuff than buy the next crap

Post Reply
  • Information
  • Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests