Faastwalker wrote:
fceramic wrote:Cool synth, but RP products generally seem bloated in the feature department. Not very user-friendly.
eusti wrote:
Would you rather have less features > less controls > a simplified user experience?
D.
I've not tried this one yet, but I agree about the arp... Usually don't use them in my RP patches either... But sometimes it yields interesting results... Well, I guess, foldable sections in REs would be a possible answer...Faastwalker wrote:
From a programming standpoint I'd say yes. It's obviously a personal view but I find the RP synths to be fantastic but extremely crowded & fiddly to use. How many times did I drag the device when working on my first patch. I'd prefer less going on & bigger controls. I'd be happy to loose the Arp section, the extra envelopes & the FX section. The big problem here is that ALL of the Vectro patches are drenched in FX. Turn them off & it goes a little flat. So it needs the onboard FX to make the patches sing.
This is my initial feeling anyway. Obviously I'm going to spend more time with this thing because the patches are gorgeous. But maybe for me it's a preset machine rather than a synth for getting your hands dirty with. I just find it too fiddly to use. It's not fun to program it's a chore. And I know the modulation lists can't be helped but they are friggin painful as they are. There must 4-5 pages of destination parameters to scroll through & they are not labelled very well.
D.