I think you misunderstood my intention with my comment. Calling the current system a "dictatorship" was meant as a joke. I simply used that word because the word "democracy" got used earlier. I just used the opposite word to democracy for some fun. To quote myself:4filegate wrote:speak in riddlesTritoneAddiction wrote: But I'm not really interested in being a judge.
But this is just one opinion, I'm sure plenty of people feel differently.
1. no argument given Jury to be called dictatorship
2. that's not the same direct democracy/democracy
3. a public vote is not the proof of democracy (direct democracy = only the participant is a part of it)
4. it is well to generate traffics
"The only problem with democracy (public voting) here is if a Song Challenge has 70-90 tracks (like with The Legend and Expanse). That's 7-9 full albums to carefully listen to and judge.
I'm not sure I would be able to find the time to listen through all that, especially if I want to give each song a fair listen and not just skim through them.
I'm up for voluntarily public voting for the 4th place, otherwise I'm fine with the dictatorship we have right now "
I thought the smiley afterwards would make that obvious and also by reading my post in its entirety. I wasn't trying to be rude or offensive. I was just trying to say I like the way the song challenges are run right now and I personally have no desire to choose the winners.
I'm sure there are lots of arguments for other judging systems and I would probably be fine with most of them, I just happen to like the way it is run right now.