Arguments about total market and user share of the Apple platform may or may not be valid. But they happen to be valid. Here's more - majority of apple computer users are housewives. Women make 80% of all purchase decisions on the market (despite men generating most of the families' income) and that's whom the marketing is really aimed at - "premium" and "sexy". HP has the same approach. And value can be measured - it's very much objective. Your PERCEPTION is subjective. Now what?WaxTrax wrote: ↑20 Feb 2023
This is absolutely untrue, and value is subjective in this case. M chips absolutely are the future in the Apple ecosystem, and the Mac Pro is the only computer still using Intel chips, and the transition to Apple Silicon on that model is expected this year.
Arguments about total market and user share of the Apple platform may or may not be valid, but there is no doubt that Apple is leaving Intel behind in all Mac computers.
And why are you turning this into "future in the apple ecosystem system" when I just said it's "not the future", by which I meant it's not the future of any kind. Intel chips are still in apple's most powerful machines not because of some contracts with intel, but because they flat-out outperform m chips in actual tasks. You can stick those into something portable - sure. And who cares if it's ARM 32 ,64 or 69 or whatever. Adding insult to injury, most of the ACTUAL "pro" software still doesn't run natively with M chips and the chances are it won't in the next decade because there is no need. Think closed/desktop CRM, factory production, oil rigs, space/ocean exploration, ballistic modelling, telescopes, engineering, architecture and sculpture, automated farms and hadron colliders. Big boys will choose their hardware to accommodate for the software, not the other way around. While Apple would have kids believe that making reaction videos on youtube or editing photographs, or even fiddling with the DAW somehow makes them "Pro".
Just because Apple is the monster that it is, it bullied the market into submission. Imagine a smaller company coming out with "hey we got a new chip that will be as good as the current one in 2-3 years, but we need you to pay for it now and by the way, all the software must be re-developed for it from ground-up and in the meantime you can use what is essentially Wine for Linux as a workaround" - that would be the last statement this company ever released.
Recap:
Apple chips are not there yet, and when they will be, they will become more expensive than the competition. And god forbid they actually gain a productivity advantage - even if they get 1%, Apple will squeeze and market this advantage for every penny like it's the best thing since sliced bread. If you think that's "the future", well... it is only in the sense that it hasn't even happened yet.