McDSP 670 compressor. Thoughts?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Jan 2015
I just purchased this compressor and it's a monster. So powerful. Anyone else got comments on it, good or bad? Cheers, Kodak.
I love it. Only have that one at present but hope to get the FRG one day. it isn't the fastest reacting but that's part of its character for me... A riding comp.
Is the 670 good for all instruments, synths, pianos and drums?
- EthicistBeats
- Posts: 82
- Joined: 18 Jan 2015
- Contact:
I really like the Mcdsp stuff. TBH i haven't totally figured out how to use this to its fullest potential tho. I tend to go for the frg-ee first because i know how to use it best. But this post has had me using the c670 all day...
The original Fairchild was meant for broadcast to level out program material of different kinds so the really fast (release) settings were probably less used in its days. Nowadays its mostly revered for its tube design and its mid/side options (which sadly aren't available in the RE but can be emulated with a M/S decoder and two instances). Personally I use it for things where I might apply a LA-2A but want more control over attack/release.
As for good/bad, its like with microphones or any audio device really.. Theres at least ONE application where its just perfect
As for good/bad, its like with microphones or any audio device really.. Theres at least ONE application where its just perfect
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Jan 2015
To me, it seems to be the most transparent comp in my rack. (I also have the FET and the LA-2A). On the master bus, offers a very transparent squash with TONS of smooth make-up gain. Almost like a maximizer.
- Ocean of Waves
- Posts: 231
- Joined: 16 Jan 2015
I have a secret love affair with mine, it's so beautiful
I really wanted to like this compressor, but I put it up against C1-L1 on a lot of different things. I could get C1-L1 to sound just like it and better in every case. I'm not a big fan of this fair-child style compressor. It's too audible in a bad way to my ears.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Jan 2015
I've been trialling the Red Rocks compressor and there's no way I can generate the same amount of smooth gain as the 670. Maybe it's just me.
- Scoobyman II
- Posts: 254
- Joined: 15 Jan 2015
- Location: Japan
- Contact:
One of my most used REs.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Jan 2015
When I put an instance on the master bus, and lower the threshold to around 3, I can crank the make-up gain to very loud levels without distortion. After bouncing, the file sounds incredibly full, detailed, and transparent. I can't get anywhere close with other comps.
For me ,670 is an excellent plugin. It adds a lot of warmth to the sound. Although with less controls like FRG and Mootube it's method of compression is smooth. Does not add as much distortion as both of those , more so the Moo. Im trialling all of these and tempted to get the bundle. If I only had to pick one tho, I would be highly tempted to grab the FRG first because of added control. But after hearing the differences in the sound quality I might go for the the 670 instead. It doesn't make the drums sound as hollow to me as with FRG. The 670 can also pretty much squash a drum loop just as adequately as the other comps and without introducing a lot of distortion when pushed hard.
It's interesting that a few people have said that this comp can bear quite a bit of gain reduction... I tend to agree with that. I use it mainly as an instrument riding comp and have found it can take 6-8dB peaks fairly well for my ears, (even though I'm generally not pushing the Gain Reduction more than 3dB) given the simple time control.
I already have a couple compressors I don't know how to use fully, what's one more?
Seriously though, I've put myself in RE timeout. Stop tempting me!
Seriously though, I've put myself in RE timeout. Stop tempting me!
My most recent: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=7504378
I personally love this one. I have it, re2a and fet, and they form a great trio. 670 is smooth and transparent, and what little color it adds is buttery and rich
I'm getting fine floral honeysuckle notes with lingering hazelnut overtones and a long, smooth delicate finish of toasted cocoa nibs and ripe tannins. An elegant, complex compressor, ready to use now or within the next five years. Perfect on the master bus or with roast chicken.
Hold the rosemary please......
So far, there isn't anything about it that I can't get with better results using the SSL. What is frustrating is that there is no manual and basically nothing on the web about it.
Yeah, it's 3 controls, how hard can that be, right? Sorry, I have no idea what "time constraint" means.
So far, there isn't anything about it that I can't get with better results using the SSL. What is frustrating is that there is no manual and basically nothing on the web about it.
Yeah, it's 3 controls, how hard can that be, right? Sorry, I have no idea what "time constraint" means.
Time constant = release. It's kinda slow, even at the fastest setting (i.e. all the way to the left).
- EthicistBeats
- Posts: 82
- Joined: 18 Jan 2015
- Contact:
I learned most about the Mcdsp c670, just by looking up what people use a fairchild 670 on. The JJP Puigchild Waves vids are good... as well as any information regarding the 670 [shit, i even read the original manual lol]. Peace, hope that helps.
You guys need to judge this thing and compare this thing with your ears, not what other people say in YouTube videos. The amount of "smooth gain reduction" or whatever you mean by that is going to be different for every sound source. I would never call 670 transparent, as I find the effect very audible. It really clamps down on things in a way that I don't find useful. The big thing you'll miss out on the 670 that you actually get with the full fairchild models is the mid side functionality.
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests